Monday, April 28, 2014

1500 Year Old Bible Confirms That Jesus Christ Was Not Crucified – Vatican In Awe

B

Much to the dismay of the Vatican, an approx. 1500-2000 year old bible was found in Turkey, in the Ethnography Museum of Ankara.  Discovered and kept secret in the year 2000, the book contains the Gospel of Barnabas – a disciple of Christ – which shows that Jesus was not crucified, nor was he the son of God, but a Prophet.  The book also calls Apostle Paul “The Impostor”.  The book also claims that Jesus ascended to heaven alive, and that Judas Iscariot was crucified in his place.

1014236_626754084021655_1217125157_n

1500-2000 year old bible found in Ankara, Turkey.
A report by The National Turk says that the Bible was seized from a gang of smugglers in a Mediterranean-area operation. The report states the gang was charged with smuggling antiquities, illegal excavations, and the possession of explosives.  The books itself is valued as high as 40 Million Turkish Liras (approx. 28 mil. Dollars).  Man, where is the Thieves Guild, when you need them?
C

Authenticity
According to reports, experts and religious authorities in Tehram insist that the book is original.  The book itself is written with gold lettering, onto loosely-tied leather in Aramaic, the language of Jesus Christ.  The text maintains a vision similar to Islam, contradicting the New Testament’s teachings of Christianity.   Jesus also foresees the coming of the Prophet Muhammad, who would found Islam 700 years later.
It is believed that, during the Council of Nicea, the Catholic Church hand-picked the gospels that form the Bible as we know it today; omitting the Gospel of Barnabas (among many others) in favor of the four canonical gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.  Many biblical texts have begun to surface over time, including those of the Dead Sea and Gnostic Gospels; but this book especially, seems to worry the Vatican.
534342_294295364008567_558471556_n
The Catholic Church Wants In
What does this mean to Christian-derived religions and their followers?  Quite a tight spot.  The Vatican has asked Turkish authorities to let them examine the contents of the book within the Church.  Now that the book has been found, will they come to accept the it and its evidence?  Will they deny it altogether?  Call it a “Muslim lie”, as did the “Truth” Magazine, in 2000?  To many, this book is a beacon of hope, that believers soon realize that the object of their adoration is arbitrary; and that all text, especially religious text, is subject to interpretation.
What does this mean to atheists/agnostics/secular thinkers?  Is the text real?  Fake?  Does it matter?  Hopefully, this news inspires the religious to ask questions, instead of pointing fingers or believing anything blindly.  Please, don’t go poking fun or tossing around the “I told you so!”s.  The biggest danger of faith is when people believe what they want to believe, defending against any and all evidence; especially when that evidence revolutionizes their foundation from the ground up.  And the biggest culprit to that danger is the ego trap: rejecting/criticizing others, for being unlike you.  For centuries, the “defense” of blind faith has driven nations to war, violence, discrimination, slavery and to become the society of automatons that we are today; and for just as long, it has been justified with lies.  If you know better, act like it.
Thanks for your time.
Now… how do we figure out Jesus’ real birth date? :/
Why Would The Vatican Be Shocked????
"When Joseph heard of his Son Jesus death he came and got the bodies from the authorities. He secured some egyptian embalmers to embalm the body to last for 10,000. The Egyptian embalmers put the body into a glass tube filled with a certain(known only to the egyptian embalmers) that will keep one's body looking the same as when it died, that is if they get to the body in a certain time, for many thousands of years as long as no air is allowed to enter the tube that the body is in." 

......"His body in the tomb in such a manner that it reflects in four different directions. This ws done to keep the enemies from knowing in just what direction them real body is lying."

"No Christian is allowed to see the body, unless they pay a price of $6000 and must get a certificate from the Pope of Rome" The tomb is guarded by Muslims.. When the Christians are allowed to see Jesus Body, they are stripped of weapons, hand cuffed behind their backs, and well-armed Muslims guards take them into the tomb."
Pope Pius XIIOn 
October 13, 1958, Pope Pius XII died. On October 14, his chief physician and
head of the Vatican's Medical Department, Prof. Riccardo Galeazzi-Lissi, held a

press conference in which he made a startling, and costly, revelation. He said he
and other physicians had succeeded in embalming the Pope "in much the same
way as had the body of Jesus been embalmed." On October 15, The New York
Times 
ran an even more startling article – startling in its frankness as if what it 
was stating was common knowledge. The title of the article read: "OLD
METHOD USED TO EMBALM POPE." The subtitle read: "Physicians Say
Procedure Was Like That Employed on body of Christ." The story read in part:
The chief physician of Pope Pius XII said today that the remains of the
pontiff were embalmed in much the same manner as had been Jesus
Christ's body.It is a method entailing no surgery and requiring no evisceration, the
physician said He declared himself confident that it was a method that
would enable the body of Pius XII to LAST INDEFINITELY WITHOUT
DECA YING…The method consisted of allowing the Pope's body to
absorb volatile resins and certain oils and other chemicals having
deoxidizing action.

7 comments:

  1. Wow! But anyone who watched Zeitgeist the Movie Part 1 on Religion already knew. It was the 'shock' that took many years to get over.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hahaha better luck next time, Mo! You won't fool us!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pretty sure this 'version' is what Mo presented to the desert rats to get them to believe he's who they should worship now. 1500-2000 years is a huge jump, folks. 2000 yrs would place it close to Christ's death so it would be miraculous to mention Mohammed. If it's 1500 (more like 1400) years old, then it ties in with the timing that Mo started raiding caravans and getting people to help him murder and rape people, and that this was written by or for Mohammed in deceiving others. I'm guessing at the latter, since the only mention of Mo in the Bible is riding a pale horse bringing death with him. All of Mo's teachings are 180 to Christ. Christ would *not* have embraces Mo.

      Delete
  3. No Problem The World Seem to be Moving 10x faster then just a year ago......we have to keep up with the ever changing frequency of thought!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. THE CONFUSION ABOUT APOLOGETICS BY STEVE FINNELL

    Apologetics Defined: the branch of theology concerned with the defense or proof of Christianity.

    Do extra-Biblical historical books confirm that the accounts of Christianity found in the Bible are true? No, they do not, the exact opposite is true. The Bible proves that extra-Biblical historical accounts of Christianity are in fact true.

    John 20:30-31 And Jesus did many other signs in the presence of His disciple, which are not written in this book; 31 but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name. (NKJV)

    The signs and miracles of Jesus written about in extra-Biblical historical accounts do not prove that Jesus performed signs and miracles. To the contrary, the signs and miracles of Jesus written in the Bible confirm that the extra-Biblical accounts are true.

    1 Corinthians 15:3-6 For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received; that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that He was seen by Cephas, then by twelve. 6 After that He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep. (NKJV)

    Extra-Biblical historical accounts of the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ do not prove the Bible to be true, however, the Bible confirms that the extra-Biblical accounts are true.

    Faith comes from hearing the gospel . Romans 10:17 So then faith comes by hearing, hearing by the word of God. (NKJV)

    Believing that the Bible is God's word and that the accounts of Christianity presented in the Bible are true are not proven by engaging in philosophical arguments nor by clever secular reasoning.


    YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY BLOG. http://steve-finnell.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete