Declassified 1967 CIA memo makes it clear that Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan personally ordered Israel's attack on the #USSLiberty. An Israeli General called it "pure murder" & several pilots resisted orders to attack. Trump & #MAGA traitors support Israel over America.
Alan Dershowitz said in the lead-up to the 2016 election that Donald Trump was more corrupt than Hillary Clinton.
"There's no comparison between who has engaged in more corruption and who is more likely to continue that if elected President of the United States," he said.
The former Harvard law professor is now defending the president in the ongoing impeachment trial.
Despite being a vocal opponent of Trump's views on various matters, Dershowitz said he is representing the president "on principle."
Constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz said in 2016 that Donald Trump was more corrupt than Hillary Clinton and could be expected to continue being corrupt if he was elected president.
Now, Dershowitz is a member of the president's impeachment defense team.
Dershowitz, a retired Harvard Law School professor, made the comments while appearing on the radio show Trending Today USA in 2016, in response to a question about the Clinton Foundation, as CNN reported.
"When you compare that to what Trump has done with Trump University, with so many other things, I think there's no comparison between who has engaged in more corruption and who is more likely to continue that if elected President of the United States," he said. "So I think what we're doing is we're comparing, we're saying, look, neither candidate is anywhere close to perfect, let's vote for the less bad candidate."
Associated Press
Trump University was a for-profit real estate training program that became defunct amid fraud allegations and class action lawsuits. In February 2018, a federal judge upheld an agreement that required the president to shell out $25 million to settle three lawsuits. Trump claimed that he could have won the case at trial, but instead chose to focus on his duties as president.
Dershowitz also criticized Trump in his book 'Electile Dysfunction'
The radio interview wasn't the only time the constitutional scholar and criminal lawyer criticized Trump during the run-up to the election.
In his 2016 book, titled "Electile Dysfunction: A Guide for Unaroused Voters," Dershowitz described Trump as a "destabilizing and unpredictable candidate" who "openly embraces fringe conspiracy theories peddled by extremists," NBC News reported.
He also wrote that Trump blatantly disregarded political, personal and professional protocol.
Dershowitz described Trump as a New York City real estate mogul who became "famous for firing people; has exploited bankruptcy laws to hurt small-business owners, workers, and other creditors; has insulted large groups of people comprising a majority of voters (women, Latinos, the physically challenged, Muslims); has used vulgar words on TV that offend Christians, parents of young children, and family-oriented people of all backgrounds."
Associated Press
Dershowitz also seemed concerned by Trump's foreign policy views, saying that it was evident he was "prepared to violate existing international and domestic laws, as well as widely accepted principles of human rights."
Worse still, he wrote in the book, was how Trump had "lurched into the realm of dog-whistle anti-Semitism by half-heartedly courting the support of white-nationalist bigots."
Dershowitz, as a guest on the Jamie Weinstein Show, also noted that Trump appeared to lack the guts to challenge the so-called alt-right movement when he was a guest
"I think he's a canny politician and he knows he can't win this election without the alt-right — without getting people to vote for him, whose views he disapproves of. But he hasn't had the courage to really stand up to the alt-right in the way he should," he said.
Observing a "kind of fascist mentality" permeating society, Dershowitz said he didn't "worry that Donald Trump will try to govern that way." He was worried, however, that Trump would "embolden and strengthen some of the fascist elements in our society."
Dershowitz said he was campaigning for Hillary Clinton at the time
When asked about his past commentary on the president, Dershowitz told NBC News: I was campaigning for Hillary Clinton at the time. I hadn't really ever met President Trump and it was just typical campaign rhetoric. I would not repeat that characterization today having met him."
Dershowitz recently made headlines for contradicting a constitutional stance he took former President Bill Clinton's impeachment trial. In 1999, he said that there "doesn't have to be a crime" to impeach a president; it's enough if the president is "somebody who completely corrupts the office."
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Now, however, he is asserting that "criminal-type behavior is required." Dershowitz plans to argue that the offenses Trump was charged with — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — aren't actual crimes so can't justify ousting him from office.
In an opinion letter to The New York Times, Dershowitz answered the lingering question of why he said "yes to Trump."
"I have stood on principle, representing people with whom I disagree as well those with whom I agree. I have never made a distinction based on partisanship," he wrote.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos compared the choice to have an abortion with the choice to own slaves, saying President Abraham Lincoln also had to contend with a misguided “pro-choice” argument.
DeVos drew barbs for the comparison, but the analogy between slavery and abortion is hardly novel. It is offensive to many who see slavery as America’s singular original sin, but it has been used for decades by abortion opponents seeking to bestow constitutional rights onto developing fetuses and to associate their movement with one that is far more unifying.
Politically, her comments could prove helpful. They are consistent with the views of her boss, President Trump, who has taken a hard-line stance against abortion rights and whose reelection depends on robust support from Christian conservatives. On Friday, he became the first president to speak at the annual antiabortion March for Life.
The education secretary’s remarks came Wednesday evening at an event for a Christian college held at the Museum of the Bible in the District. She touted the Trump administration’s work to advance antiabortion policies, including putting two conservative Supreme Court justices on the bench, and said she hopes to make abortion not just unconstitutional but “unthinkable.”
She then added that the abortion debate reminded her of President Lincoln, who led the fight to preserve the United States and stamp out slavery in the South.
“He too contended with the ‘pro-choice’ arguments of his day,” she said, according to a copy of her remarks provided by the Education Department. “They suggested that a state’s ‘choice’ to be slave or to be free had no moral question in it.”
She said Lincoln “reminded those pro-choicers” that most Americans viewed slavery as a “vast moral evil.”
“Lincoln was right about slavery ‘choice’ then, and he would be right about the life ‘choice’ today,” she said. “Freedom is not about doing what we want. Freedom is about having the right to do what we ought.”
In DeVos’s telling, abortion is an evil akin to slavery, placing those who support legalized abortion rights on a moral par with those who backed slavery in Lincoln’s time.
“To compare anything to slavery is to devalue America’s greatest crime and those who endured. Repulsive,” Rep. Katherine M. Clark (D-Mass.) said on Twitter. Another Massachusetts Democrat, Rep. Ayanna Pressley, wrote: “As a Black woman & the Chair of the abortion access task force, I invite you to come by the Hill and say this to my face. Would welcome the opportunity to educate you.”
Abby Martin sits down with Peter Phillips, former director of Project Censored and professor of Political Sociology at Sonoma State University. His new book “Giants: The Global Power Elite” details the 17 transnational investment firms which control over $50 trillion in wealth—and how they are kept in power by their activists, facilitators and protectors.
Jay Electronica, Dr Wesley Muhammad and Minister Hilary Muhammad at The Oxford Union discussing "Islam and the West, The Clash of Civilisations".
Directed by Nathan X. Filmed and Edited by Nathan X and James Ward.
Sign the petition to lift the unjust ban excluding The Honourable Minister Louis Farrakhan from entering the United Kingdom: http://goo.gl/I73O4S#freespeechforALL2015
For more information on The Nation of Islam: http://www.noi.org.uk Please visit us at The Nation Of Islam European HQ at: 1-5 Hinton Road, Brixton, SE24 0HJ London, United Kingdom.
Sunday Meetings: 11am - 1pm - A keynote Address from the European Regional Representative of The Honourable Minister Louis Farrakhan and The Nation of Islam, Student Minister Hilary Muhammad
Pent-up frustrations boiled over in many poor African-American neighborhoods during the mid- to late-1960s, setting off riots that rampaged out of control from block to block. Burning, battering and ransacking property, raging crowds created chaos in which some neighborhood residents and law enforcement operatives endured shockingly random injuries or deaths. Many Americans blamed the riots on outside agitators or young black men, who represented the largest and most visible group of rioters. But, in March 1968, the Kerner Commission turned those assumptions upside-down, declaring white racism—not black anger—turned the key that unlocked urban American turmoil.
Bad policing practices, a flawed justice system, unscrupulous consumer credit practices, poor or inadequate housing, high unemployment, voter suppression, and other culturally embedded forms of racial discrimination all converged to propel violent upheaval on the streets of African-American neighborhoods in American cities, north and south, east and west. And as black unrest arose, inadequately trained police officers and National Guard troops entered affected neighborhoods, often worsening the violence.
“White society,” the presidentially appointed panel reported, “is deeply implicated in the ghetto. White institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white society condones it.” The nation, the Kerner Commission warned, was so divided that the United States was poised to fracture into two radically unequal societies—one black, one white.
The riots represented a different kind of political activism, says William S. Pretzer, the National Museum of African American History and Culture’s senior curator. “Commonly sparked by repressive and violent police actions, urban uprisings were political acts of self-defense and racial liberation on a mass, public scale. Legislative successes at the federal level with the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts were not reflected in the daily lives of African-Americans facing police misconduct, economic inequality, segregated housing, and inferior educations.” Black racial violence was not unique in 1960s American culture, Pretzer says: White Southerners set a precedent by viciously attacking Freedom Riders and other civil rights protesters.
Does decanting wine work?
Speed
Normal
Quality
Auto
Quality
Auto
180p
270p
406p
720pHD
1080pHD
Speed
0.25
0.50
0.75
Normal
1.25
1.50
1.75
00:22
00:59
00:01
Powered by Minute Media
President Lyndon Johnson constituted the Kerner Commission to identify the genesis of the violent 1967 riots that killed 43 in Detroit and 26 in Newark, while causing fewer casualties in 23 other cities. The most recent investigation of rioting had been the McCone Commission, which explored the roots of the 1965 Watts riot and accused “riffraff” of spurring unrest. Relying on the work of social scientists and in-depth studies of the nation’s impoverished black urban areas, or ghettoes as they were often called, the Kerner Commission reached a quite different interpretation about the riots’ cause.
In moments of strife, the commission determined, fear drove violence through riot-torn neighborhoods. During the Detroit mayhem, “the city at this time was saturated with fear. The National Guardsmen were afraid, the citizens were afraid, and the police were afraid,” the report stated. The commission confirmed that nervous police and National Guardsmen sometimes fired their weapons recklessly after hearing gunshots. Intermittently, they targeted elusive or non-existent snipers, and as National Guardsmen sought the source of gunfire in one incident, they shot five innocent occupants of a station wagon, killing one of them. Contrary to some fear-driven beliefs in the white community, the overwhelming number of people killed in Detroit and Newark were African-American, and only about 10 percent of the dead were government employees.
Finding the truth behind America’s race riots was a quest undertaken not just by the Kerner Commission: in late 1967 Newsweekproduced a large special section reporting on the disturbances and offering possible solutions to racial inequality.
A copy of that issue resides in the collections of the National Museum of African American History and Culture. The magazine’s graphically powerful cover depicts two raised African-American hands. One forms the fist of black power; the other has slightly curled fingers. Perhaps, Pretzer says, that hand is reaching for the American dream—or on its way to closing another fist. “It was deliberately ambiguous,” he states. In addition, the cover bears this headline: “The Negro in America: What Must Be Done.” This seems to characterize African-Americans as nothing more than “a subject to be analyzed and decisions made about and for,” Pretzer believes.
The magazine interviewed a city planner who believed the answer lay in regimented integration. Under his plan, only a certain number of blacks would be re-located in each suburb so that whites would never feel threatened by their black neighbors. This would a create an integrated society, but would integration be right if it was achieved by once again limiting black options? As Pretzer suggests, the magazine’s exploration of radical change somehow still managed to treat African-Americans more like chess pieces than human beings, who might want to choose where they lived.
The magazine’s editor, Osborn Elliott, believed the package represented a move away from the objective reporting revered in this era and a rush toward a new type of advocacy journalism. Rather than merely reciting the numbers of people dead, buildings damaged, and store windows shattered, Newsweek sought to shape a future without these statistics. “The problem is urgent—as the exploding cities and the incendiary rhetoric make inescapably plain,” the magazine argued. Instead of whispering in its readers’ ears, Newsweek was screaming in their faces. The magazine published its issue about three months before the March final report of the Kerner Commission. This special project won a 1968 National Magazine Award from the American Society of Magazine Editors. Newsweek’s findings did not go unnoticed, but the Kerner report created considerably more controversy. It rebutted a common critique contrasting the mass of primarily European immigrants who crowded into slums in the early 20th-century and African-Americans who moved from the rural South to urban centers in the middle of the century. Because most immigrants gradually moved up America’s social ladder, some have suggested that harder work would lead African-Americans out of poverty and into the middle class.
To the contrary, the commission argued that the crush of immigrants occurred when the boom of industrialization was creating unskilled jobs more quickly than they could be filled. African-Americans, on the other hand, arrived as industrialization wound down and the supply of unskilled jobs plummeted. Also, racial discrimination limited African-Americans’ ability to escape from poverty.
Moreover, the report deplored a common reaction to riots: arming police officers with more deadly weapons to use in heavily populated urban neighborhoods. Its primary recommendation was “a policy which combines ghetto enrichment with programs designed to encourage integration of substantial numbers of Negroes into the society outside the ghetto.”
Both the Kerner Commission and Newsweek proposed aggressive government spending to provide equal opportunities to African-Americans, and each won praise from African-American leaders and white liberals. Even so, the president of the United States was not a fan.
Johnson faced no pressure to respond to Newsweek, but it is rare for a president to offer no public endorsement of a report produced by his own hand-picked commission. Still, that’s what LBJ did.
The president had chosen moderate commission members because he believed they would support his programs, seek evidence of outside agitation, and avoid assigning guilt to the very people who make or break national politicians—the white middle class. The report blindsided him. He had suggested that Communist agitation fired up the riots and to his dismay, the report disagreed, asserting that the riots “were not caused by, nor were they the consequences of, any organized plan or ‘conspiracy.’” And the commission rejected another common allegation: the charge that irresponsible journalists inflamed ghetto neighborhoods.
Despite Johnson’s feelings, or perhaps because of them, the report became big news. “Johnson Unit Assails Whites in Negro Riots,” read a headline in the New York Times. Rushed into print by Bantam Books, the 708-page report became a best-seller, with 740,000 copies sold in a few weeks. The Times featured front-page articles about the report every day in the first week following its release. Within a few days, both CBS and NBC aired documentaries about the ties between race and poverty.
Backlash was immediate. Polls showed that 53 percent of white Americans condemned the claim that racism had caused the riots, while 58 percent of black Americans agreed with the findings. Even before the report, white support for civil rights was waning. In 1964, most Northern whites had backed Johnson’s civil rights initiatives, but just two years later, polls showed that most Northern whites believed Johnson was pushing too aggressively.
White response to the Kerner Commission helped to lay the foundation for the law-and-order campaign that elected Richard Nixon to the presidency later that year. Instead of considering the full weight of white prejudice, Americans endorsed rhetoric that called for arming police officers like soldiers and cracking down on crime in inner cities.
Both the Kerner Commission Report and the Newsweek package called for massive government spending.
When John F. Kennedy declared that an American would reach the moon by the end of the 1960s, even Republicans lined up behind him. In 1968, as they proposed an ambitious cure for racial inequality, Kerner Commission members probably heard echoes of JFK’s words: “We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.”
Indeed, the United States was prosperous enough to reach for the moon; nevertheless, Pretzer says, “The Johnson administration would not shift resources from the war in Vietnam to social reform, and Congress would not agree to tax increases. Further, state legislatures routinely blunted the local impact of federal actions.”
Ultimately, going to the moon was far easier than solving the nation’s racial issues. Politically, spending billions on space travel was more saleable than striving to correct racial inequality. Since the arrival of the first African slaves in North America early in the 17th-century, prejudice, often supported by law, has circumscribed the experiences of African-Americans.
Even when the first black president sat in the White House, lethal police attacks on young black men created racial turmoil. African-American poverty remains an issue today. In 1969, about one-third of blacks lived below the poverty line. By 2016, that number had dropped to 22 percent as a significant number of African-Americans moved into the middle class with a boost from 1960s legislation, but the percentage of blacks living in poverty is still more than twice as high as the percentage of whites. Blacks now have a louder voice in government, and yet, poverty and disenfranchisement remain. Notwithstanding the Kerner Commission’s optimism about potential change, there have been only scattered efforts over the last 50 years to end America’s racial divide or to address the racial component of poverty in the United States.
https://news.yahoo.com/3-years-ago-alan-dershowitz-160011227.html?soc_src=hl-viewer&soc_trk=tw